Affiliation: University of Iowa
Sarah Bond is Associate Professor of History at the University of Iowa. She holds degrees in Ancient History (Ph.D.) and History (M.A.) from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Classics and history (B.A.) from the University of Virginia, Charlottesville. Her areas of specialization are Late Antiquity, Digital Humanities, GIS, Material Culture, and Public Outreach. In 2020, she received the Women’s Classical Caucus’ Public Scholarship Award. Professor Bond published Trade and Taboo: Disreputable Professions in the Roman Mediterranean with the University of Michigan Press (2017).
October 20, 2021 @ 6:30 pm
October 19, 2021 @ 6:00 pm
Perhaps no other color in history has been so celebrated and so reviled as the color purple. Although it has come to be known as the shade of royalty, the workers who labored to make the mucus-based dye in the Roman Mediterranean were often viewed as lowly and as smelly as the mollusks the harvested. During the later Roman empire, these workers were even subject to state control within a caste-like system that made their jobs hereditary. If we look to the history of another purplish hue, indigo, we see a similar regulation of the labor force — and the very bodies — of those enslaved workers used to produce it in the Antebellum South. From diamonds to coal to Tyrian purple to indigo, the workers who create luxury goods often do not enjoy the same status as their products. This lecture looks at the archaeological and literary evidence for these often-invisible workers in order to reconstruct the lives of ancient dye workers, while also reminding us of the enslaved labor that continues to create the products we use or the buildings we admire even today.
Andrea Feeser, Red, White, and Black Make Blue: Indigo in the Fabric of Colonial South Carolina Life. (University of Georgia Press, 2013).
Amalie Skovmøller, Facing the Colours of Roman Portraiture: Exploring the Materiality of Ancient Polychrome Forms (De Gruyter, 2020).
Can archaeology be political? Can it be used for nefarious purposes? This lecture explores how the remains of antiquity were use to service the political objectives of the present. The ties between archaeology and nationalism were particularly strong within the National Socialist regime in Germany from 1933-1945 as well as in the National Fascist Party’s rule in Italy from 1922 to 1943. Both Hitler and Benito Mussolini saw archaeological sites, material culture, and archaeologists themselves as a physical means to legitimize, justify, and communicate their own power––and their own mythic narrative. In 1935, the head of the SS and Gestapo, Heinrich Himmler, founded a branch of the SS called the Ahnenerbe in order to use archaeological research and excavation to uncover the connections between modern Germans and ancient Aryans. Meanwhile in Rome, Mussolini was often on site for photo-ops in order to strike the first blow of the pick before Italian archaeologists demolished modern or medieval remains in the Roman Forum or elsewhere in the Eternal City in order to recover the ancient Roman city made into marble by Rome’s first princeps, Augustus. From the use the torch relay to connect Berlin with the site of ancient Olympia in 1936 to the rebuilding of the Ara Pacis in Rome, archaeology was a cornerstone of both Nazi and Fascist propaganda programs. The question is: how do we keep this exploitation of the past from happening again?
Bettina Arnold, “‘Arierdämmerung’: Race and Archaeology in Nazi Germany,” World Archaeology, 38.1 (2006): 8–31.
Sarah E. Bond, “The Political Uses of a Figure of Male Beauty from Antiquity,” Hyperallergic (June 27, 2018).
Johann Chapoutot, Greeks, Romans, Germans: How the Nazis Usurped Europe’s Classical Past (UC Press, 2016).
Andrew P. McFeaters, “The Past Is How We Present It: Nationalism and Archaeology in Italy from Unification to WWII,” Nebraska Anthropologist 33 (2007): 49-62.
Cord J. Whitaker, The Problem of Alt-Right Medievalist White Supremacy, and Its Black Medievalist Answer (Routledge, 2020).